DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-078
NAME
CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.4 ART 1.B.17, JKA, Pattern of
Misconduct, RE4
a
BY DRB
CORRECTIONS
TIS 3 yrs, 3 months, 18 days
Policy Implications _| None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to two Non-Judicial punishments within a 2 year
period. The applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board
to review. The Board utilized available information contained in electronic records and documents submitted
by the applicant.
In addition to the Non-Judicial punishments (NJPs) in 2010, the applicant became drunk and disorderly while at
“A” School in the Fall of 2011 by slamming on student doors and attempting to intimidate other shipmates into
a physical altercation. All of these infractions that included prior insubordination, professional negligence and
disobeying orders resulted in Discipline evaluations that led to his Discharge in early 2012.
The applicant was notified of the intent to discharge, and the applicant was advised of the rights to an attorney.
A statement was made while objecting to discharge.
The Board notes that the applicant’s command recommended an Honorable Discharge, but FORCECOM
recommended a General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge when a Second Chance waiver for retention
was requested and denied. With the final approval, PSC-EPM approved it for an Honorable Discharge.
Thereafter, the SPO issued an Under Honorable Conditions character of Service.
Based on the final approval made by EPM, the Board recommends an administrative change to Honorable for
the applicant.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Relief to Honorable based on the
administrative error made by the Servicing Personnel Office. All other items shall stand as issued.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 055
The following provides an outline of the approval process and the notable findings: Applicant’s command: Made separation notification after just 3 months on performance probation. The current application requests to remove the Narrative Reason (NR) as ‘Unacceptable Conduct’, and to amend it to a Voluntary Separation that is in alignment with SPD code KND with an NR of Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons. EPM separation approval (summary): In the summer of 2013, the Discharge was...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 032
In early 2012, the applicant’s command initiated Discharge proceedings based on the two alcohol incidents. Furthermore, the applicant mentions no details or mitigating factors about the Felony Battery with no contest plea. Prior to epm’s final approval, the Admiral serving as the local Discharge authority fully endorsed the Discharge due to commission of a serious offense with a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 029
In 2010, the applicant pled ‘no contest’ in a civilian court to third degree assault consummated by Battery. The Board has no issues with the discharge issued. The local command, intermediate level Commander, and EPM all endorsed the punishment rendered and the subsequent separation.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 032
The NJP results specify that the spouse had suffered a fractured nose and received stitches. The separation package does show an Honorable recommendation from the Sector, but this is due to the pattern of misconduct vice the voluntary plea on the application and supporting statements. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 033
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-033 NAME E3 CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, CGPSC-EPM, JKQ, Misconduct, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Honorable RELIEF GRANTED Honorable, JND SPD code, Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons BY DRB ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 2 yrs, 3 months, 6 days Policy Implications __| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Commission of a Serious Offense in 2013. The command recommended the applicant for an...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 060
The applicant had a positive urinalysis result during a random testing in late 2012. The applicant’s had 10 years of service which afforded the right to an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) that occurred in the Spring of 2013. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 056
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-056 CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, ART 12.B.18, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 BY DRB to JHJ, RE code to RE-3Y, Narrative Reason to Unsatisfactory Performance CORRECTIONS TIS 1 yr, 6 months, 16 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to receiving two Non-Judicial punishments within a 2 year period. In 2010, the command initiated Discharge proceedings which made...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 027
The Majority board recommends partial relief on the applicant’s Character of Service, based on the post-policy issued in ALCOAST 562/08. And, ALCOAST 254/05 on May 12, 2005 stated the following: “The Coast Guard may resume Anthrax vaccinations for personnel assigned to designated commands but only under the condition that personnel scheduled to receive the Anthrax vaccination may ACCEPT or REFUSE the vaccination. Board Conclusion: The Majority Board (3-2) recommends no relief to the...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 034
The applicant made the request for the separation shortly after. Aside from the administrative error, the Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Due to the administrative error made, a Honorable Discharge will be issued as directed by PSC (epm).
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 051
SECCEN followed up in late 2006 to indicate that no improvement had been made to eliminate the sizable debt that the applicant had created over a significant amount of time. Additionally, the command formally counseled applicant on the need to change their rating for retention in the service. Discharge: No change | 25.